Top
All studies
Early treatment
Mortality
Early mortality
Prophylaxis
Prophylaxis mortality
Long COVID
Transmission
Physicians
Recently added
Recent studies
Feedback
 
Analgesics
Antiandrogens
Antihistamines
Budesonide
Colchicine
Conv. Plasma
Curcumin
Fluvoxamine
Hydroxychlor..
Ivermectin
Lifestyle
Melatonin
Metformin
Minerals
Monoclonals
Mpro inhibitors
Naso/orophar..
Nigella Sativa
Nitazoxanide
PPIs
Quercetin
RdRp inhibitors
TMPRSS2 inh.
Thermotherapy
Vitamins
More

Other
Feedback
Home
 
c19early.org COVID-19 treatment researchSelect treatment..Select..
Budesonide Meta
Colchicine Meta Nigella Sativa Meta
Conv. Plasma Meta Nitazoxanide Meta
Curcumin Meta PPIs Meta
Fluvoxamine Meta Quercetin Meta
Hydroxychlor.. Meta
Ivermectin Meta
Thermotherapy Meta
Melatonin Meta
Metformin Meta

COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 6,020 studies

 
Hobbs
PRINCIPLE RCT 413 outpatients patients showing significantly faster recovery with HCQ. Publication was delayed over 5 years. Treatment was very late..
Wimalawansa
Review of food, drug, and nutraceutical regulations and their impact on public health and healthcare costs. Author argues that the current..
COVID-19 involves the interplay of over 200 viral and host proteins and factors, providing many therapeutic targets. c19early analyzes over 6,000 studies for 175 treatments—over 17 million hours of research. US authorities believe only three high-profit early treatments reduce risk (remdesivir, paxlovid, molnupiravir). In reality, many treatments reduce risk, and 26 low-cost treatments have been approved across 163 countries. 0.6% of 9,000+ proposed treatments show reduced risk.
Direct treatment to the primary source of initial infection reduces progression and transmission.
Exercise, sunlight, a healthy diet, and good sleep all reduce risk.
Vitamins A, C, D, and zinc show reduced risk, as with other viruses.
Methods for increasing internal body temperature, comparable to natural fever, enhancing immune system function.
Many systemic agents reduce risk, and may be required when infection progresses beyond the upper respiratory tract.
High-profit systemic agents are also effective, but have greater access and cost barriers.
Highly effective for matching variants but rarely used, with high cost, variant dependence, and IV/SC administration.
Acetaminophen increases the risk of severe outcomes and mortality.
Studies show increased mortality with longer followup.
c19early.org
We do not provide medical advice. No treatment is 100% effective, and all may have side effects. Protocols combine multiple treatments. Consult a qualified physician for personalized risk/benefit analysis.
$0 $1,000 $2,000+ -25+% 0% 25% 50% Treatment cost (US$) Efficacy vs. cost for COVID-19 treatments +38 more high-profit -ve drugs Glenzocimab -60% >$2,000 Olokizumab -50% >$2,000 PPIs -46% BMS mAbs -36% >$2,000 Darunavir -34% Acetaminophen -28% Cenicriviroc -28% >$2,000 Lufotrelvir >$2,000 Plitidepsin >$2,000 Losartan Sargramostim >$2,000 Cannabidiol Dexamethasone Lopinavir/ritonavir Ravulizumab >$2,000 Conv. Plasma $5,000 Remdesivir $3,120 Sarilumab >$2,000 Ibuprofen PPE Aspirin Tocilizumab Molnupiravir mutagenic/teratogenic Favipiravir Paxlovid Ensitrelvir Famotidine Vitamin C Sotrovimab $2,100 TMPRSS2 i.. Amubarvimab/r.. NAC Azvudine Vilobelimab $6,350 Colchicine Budesonide Probiotics Zinc HCQ Nitric Oxide Antiandro.. Metformin Sleep Vitamin A Tixagevimab/c.. Bebtelovimab H1RAs Sunlight Vitamin D H. Peroxide Exercise Fluvox. Curcumin N. Sativa NaHCO₃ Melatonin Casirivimab/i.. $2,100 Quercetin Bamlanivimab/e.. Ensovibep >$2,000 pH+ PVP-I Diet Regdanvimab $2,100 Thermotherapy Ivermectin Lifestyle / free No prescription Prescription required High-cost Lowerrisk Higherrisk c19early.org July 2025 COVID-19 involves the interplay of 100+ host/viral proteins/factors, modulated by many treatments. 0.6% of 9,000+proposed treatments show efficacy with ≥3 studies.Protocols combine treatments, none are 100% effective.c19early analyzes over 6,000 studies for 175 treatments.
$0 $1,000 $2,000+ -20+% 0% 25% 50% Treatment cost (US$) Efficacy vs. cost for COVID-19 treatments +38 more high-profit -ve drugs Glenzocimab -60% Olokizumab -50% PPIs -46% BMS mAbs -36% Acetaminophen -28% Cenicriviroc -28% Lufotrelvir -22% Plitidepsin Losartan Sargramostim CBD Dexame.. Lopinav.. Vit. B9 Ravulizumab C. Plasma Remdesivir Sarilumab Ibuprofen PPE Aspirin Tocilizumab Molnupiravir mutagenic/teratogenic Favipir.. Paxlovid Famotidine Vitamin C Sotrovimab TMPRSS2 i.. Amubarvimab/r.. NAC Azvudine Vilobelimab Colchicine Budesonide Probiotics Zinc HCQ Nitric Oxide Antiandro.. Metformin Sleep Vitamin A Tixagev.. Bebtelovimab H1RAs Sunlight Vitamin D H. Peroxide Exercise Fluvox. Curcumin N. Sativa NaHCO₃ Melatonin Casirivim.. Quercetin Bamlan.. Ensovibep pH+ PVP-I Diet Regdanvimab Thermotherapy Ivermectin Lifestyle / free No prescription Prescription required High-cost Lowerrisk Higherrisk c19early.org July 2025 COVID-19 involves the interplay of100+ host/viral proteins/factors.0.6% of 9,000+ treatments showefficacy. Protocols combinetreatments. c19early analyzes6,000+ studies for 175 treatments.
c19early.org July 2025 Media censorship for COVID-19 low-cost treatments Media censored positive studies, focusing on negative studies for low-cost treatments Data from Altmetric: studies receiving significant mainstream media coverage from 6,000+ studies for 175 treatments For low-cost treatments the media covered only 18 positive studies: fluvoxamine (3), HCQ (2), antiandrogens (2), budesonide (2), vitamin D, melatonin, probiotics, ivermectin, cannabidiol, famotidine, curcumin, resveratrol, UDCA 53 negative studies were covered: HCQ (15), ivermectin (7), lopinavir/r.. (5), vitamin D (5), azithromycin (4), zinc (2), vitamin C (2), metformin (2), fluvoxamine (2), indomethacin, colchicine, seleniumprobiotics, vitamin A, ibuprofen, antiandrogens, vitamin B9, cannabidiol 98% of studies showing significantly lower risk were censored (during a pandemic killing millions): 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
c19early.org July 2025 C19 media censorship Media censored positive studies Data from Altmetric: studies receiving significant media coverage from 6,000+ studies for 175 treatments For low-cost treatments media covered only 18 positive studies: fluvoxamine (3), HCQ (2), antiandrogens (2), budesonide (2), vitamin D, ... 53 negative studies were covered: HCQ (15), ivermectin (7), lopinavir/r.. (5), vitamin D (5), azithromycin (4), ... 98% of positive studies were not covered: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
$0 $500 $1,000+ COVID-19 treatment protocols efficacy vs. cost United Kingdom Russia USA Sudan Angola Colombia Kenya Mozambique Pakistan Argentina Vietnam Peru Philippines Spain Brazil Italy France Japan China Uzbekistan Nepal Ethiopia Iran Ghana Mexico South Korea Germany Bangladesh Saudi Arabia Algeria Morocco Yemen Poland India DR Congo Madagascar Thailand Uganda Venezuela Nigeria Egypt Bolivia Taiwan Zambia Fiji Bosnia-Herzegovina Ukraine Côte d'Ivoire Bulgaria Greece Slovakia Singapore Iceland New Zealand Czechia Mongolia Israel Trinidad and Tobago Hong Kong North Macedonia Belarus Qatar Panama Serbia CAR Treatment protocols varied widely around the world.Low-cost and non-prescription treatments reduce barriersto treatment—especially early treatment—and providecomplementary and synergistic benefits. More effective More expensive c19early.org July 2025 75% 50% 25% ≤0%
$0 $500 $1,000+ C19 treatment protocols avg. efficacy/cost United Kingdom Russia USA Sudan Angola Colombia Kenya Mozambique Pakistan Argentina Vietnam Peru Philippines Spain Brazil Italy France Japan China Uzbekistan Nepal Ethiopia Iran Ghana Mexico South Korea Germany Bangladesh Saudi Arabia Algeria Morocco Yemen Poland India DR Congo Madagascar Thailand Uganda Venezuela Nigeria Egypt Bolivia Taiwan Zambia Fiji Ukraine Côte d'Ivoire Eritrea Bulgaria Greece Slovakia Singapore New Zealand Malawi Czechia Mongolia Israel Trinidad and Tobago North Macedonia Belarus Qatar Panama Serbia Syria Treatment protocols varied widely.Low-cost and non-prescription treatmentsreduce barriers to treatment—especiallyearly treatment—and provide complementaryand synergistic benefits. More effective More expensive c19early.org July 2025 75% 50% 25% ≤0%
SA58 Cetylpyridinium Chloride Azvudine Chlorpheniramine NaCl Tixagevimab/c.. Sodium Bicarbonate Paxlovid Regdanvimab Vitamin B12 Sunlight Phthalocyanine Montelukast Alkalinization Fluvoxamine Famotidine Molnupiravir Quercetin Diet Bamlanivimab/e.. Hydrogen Peroxide TMPRSS2 inhibitors Budesonide Probiotics Casirivimab/i.. Sleep Curcumin Povidone-Iodine Nigella Sativa Tocilizumab Melatonin Antihistamine H1RAs Acetaminophen ↑risk Exercise Vitamin D Antiandrogens Vitamin C PPIs ↑risk Colchicine Ivermectin Metformin Zinc HCQ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Pooled outcomes Specific outcome RCT pooled RCT specific Statistically significant ≥10% improvement ≥3 studies c19early.org July 2025 Time when COVID-19 studies showed efficacy
SA58 Cetylpyridinium Chloride Azvudine Chlorpheniramine NaCl Tixagevimab/c.. Sodium Bicarb.. Paxlovid Regdanvimab Vitamin B12 Sunlight Phthalocyanine Montelukast Alkalinization Fluvoxamine Famotidine Molnupiravir Quercetin Diet Bamlanivimab/e.. Hydrogen Peroxide TMPRSS2 inhibitors Budesonide Probiotics Casirivimab/i.. Sleep Curcumin Povidone-Iodine Nigella Sativa Tocilizumab Melatonin H1RAs Acetaminophen ↑risk Exercise Vitamin D Antiandrogens Vitamin C PPIs ↑risk Colchicine Ivermectin Metformin Zinc HCQ 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Pooled outcomes Specific outcome RCT pooled RCT specific Statistically significant ≥10% improvement ≥3 studies c19early.org July 2025 Time when COVID-19 studies showed efficacy
Timeline for when studies showed efficacy - details and limitations. 0.5% of treatments show efficacy.
July 2025
c19early.org
Cost per life saved from NNT in
studies to date
Melatonin
10
48%
  $8
Alkalinization
9
46%
  $9
Vitamin D
73
38%
  $10
Zinc
22
30%
  $16
Vitamin C
46
20%
  $18
HCQ
254
27%
  $26
Ivermectin
53
47%
  $26
Colchicine
43
28%
  $31
Aspirin
68
8%
  $45
Vitamin A
5
30%
  $45
Curcumin
8
63%
  $59
Famotidine
21
18%
  $94
Metformin
72
37%
  $121
Quercetin
5
61%
  $127
Probiotics
10
59%
  $172
Antiandrogens
32
37%
  $179
Nigella Sativa
5
57%
  $187
Fluvoxamine
10
44%
  $411
Budesonide
12
26%
  $574
Azvudine
26
29%
  $1,259
Favipiravir
42
6%
  $1,935
Tixagev../c..
10
40%
  $74,506
Regdanvimab
7
63%
  $139,860
Sotrovimab
14
46%
  $299,464
Bamlaniv../e..
13
54%
  $301,549
Casirivimab/..
11
20%
  $452,469
Bebtelovimab
4
60%
  $737,601
Remdesivir
67
1%
  $1,558,440
Paxlovid
41
22%
  $1,901,782
Molnupiravir
27
13%
  $2,400,867
Conv. Plasma
55
-2%
N/A
Acetaminophen
14
-24%
N/A
PPIs
20
-40%
N/A
Brensocatib
1
-41%
N/A
Treatment cost times median NNT - details and limitations. 0.5% of treatments show efficacy.
Loading..
All clinical results for selected treatments. 0.5% of treatments show efficacy.
Loading..
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2+ Cetylpyridin.. 83% [6-97%] 3 $1 94 very limited data Cost Studies Patients Improvement Relative Risk Iota-carragee.. 80% [22-95%] 1 $1 394 very limited data Proxalutamide 78% [70-83%] 4 $500 1K limited data Indomethacin 74% [-20-94%] 4 $5 605 limited data Chlorhexidine 71% [57-80%] 5 $1 722 limited data SA58 67% [17-87%] 3 $700 4K limited data Sentinox 67% [-83-94%] 1 $25 57 very limited data Mebendazole 62% [12-83%] 3 $1 411 very limited data Ivermectin 60% [52-67%] 105 $1 220K Chlorphenira.. 56% [46-64%] 3 $5 806 very limited data Thermotherapy 56% [9-78%] 4 $0 217 very limited data Regdanvimab 55% [30-72%] 12 $2,100 7K Diet 51% [42-58%] 30 $0 690K Povidone-Iod.. 49% [38-58%] 22 $1 3K Alkalinization 49% [36-59%] 14 $1 6K HH-120 49% [-60-84%] 2 $500 345 very limited data Ensovibep 47% [-108-87%] 2 $2,100 885 limited data Bamlaniv../e.. 47% [25-62%] 21 $1,250 30K variant dependent Quercetin 46% [20-64%] 12 $5 1K Casirivimab/i.. 45% [26-58%] 34 $2,100 50K variant dependent Resveratrol 44% [-4-70%] 3 $1 360 limited data Adintrevimab 43% [-169-88%] 2 $2,100 2K intramuscular Melatonin 43% [31-54%] 19 $1 14K Bromhexine 43% [-5-69%] 7 $5 875 very limited data Sodium Bicar.. 43% [23-58%] 6 $1 1K Nigella Sativa 43% [24-57%] 14 $5 3K Propolis 41% [-13-69%] 3 $1 410 very limited data Curcumin 41% [30-50%] 28 $5 15K Fluvoxamine 39% [21-52%] 21 $4 30K Montelukast 39% [14-56%] 9 $2 2K limited data Exercise 39% [33-44%] 68 $0 1M Hydrogen Per.. 39% [6-60%] 8 $1 847 very limited data Vitamin D 38% [33-43%] 126 $1 190K Phthalocyan.. 38% [20-51%] 4 $5 5K Xiannuoxin 38% [-46-73%] 2 $106 1K very limited data Sunlight 37% [22-50%] 5 $0 19K H1RAs 36% [20-48%] 17 $5 70K Nitazoxanide 35% [-8-61%] 14 $4 3K Selenium 34% [-40-69%] 4 $1 21K Bebtelovimab 34% [-24-65%] 6 $1,200 13K intravenous Tixagev../c.. 34% [11-51%] 19 $855 30K variant dependent Artemisinin 34% [11-51%] 3 $1 217 very limited data Bemnifosbuvir 32% [-74-73%] 4 $500 2K very limited data Vitamin A 31% [11-47%] 15 $2 22K Sleep 31% [23-39%] 16 $0 420K Metformin 31% [27-34%] 106 $10 350K Spironolactone 31% [15-44%] 12 $5 28K Antiandrogens 30% [21-38%] 49 $5 120K Nafamostat 30% [10-46%] 7 $1 16K very limited data Vitamin B12 30% [5-48%] 4 $1 11K Nitric Oxide 30% [1-50%] 13 $11 2K Hydroxychlor.. 28% [25-31%] 424 $1 590K Zinc 28% [18-36%] 47 $1 50K Probiotics 28% [18-36%] 28 $5 19K Budesonide 28% [18-36%] 15 $4 28K Colchicine 28% [18-36%] 57 $1 30K Ibuzatrelvir 27% [15-38%] 1 $1,390 126 very limited data Andrograph.. 27% [-8-50%] 7 $5 1K Vilobelimab 26% [-4-48%] 1 $6,350 368 intravenous Azvudine 25% [17-33%] 37 $25 40K N-acetylcys.. 25% [14-35%] 24 $1 26K Amubarv../r.. 25% [-70-66%] 4 $1,380 1K intravenous Lactoferrin 24% [-24-53%] 8 $5 1K TMPRSS2 inh. 23% [10-33%] 29 $5 19K Sotrovimab 22% [10-32%] 28 $2,100 50K variant dependent Vitamin C 21% [15-28%] 75 $1 80K Leritrelvir 21% [3-35%] 2 $50 1K very limited data Azelastine 21% [-3-39%] 3 $5 310 very limited data Niclosamide 20% [-48-57%] 6 $50 2K very limited data UDCA 19% [-3-36%] 21 $15 40K NaCl 18% [3-31%] 8 $0 816 limited data Camostat 18% [-3-34%] 16 $1 2K SNS812 17% [4-29%] 1 $1,000 90 very limited data Famotidine 17% [8-24%] 30 $5 110K Ensitrelvir 14% [2-25%] 7 $500 4K very limited data Vitamin K 14% [0-25%] 2 $1 7K very limited data Paxlovid 13% [9-17%] 82 $1,390 160K independent trials refused Atilotrelvir 13% [1-23%] 1 $65 1K very limited data Deuremidevir 11% [-1-21%] 2 $112 1K very limited data Favipiravir 10% [2-17%] 75 $20 30K worse w/longer followup Molnupiravir 9% [2-16%] 51 $707 180K mutagenic/teratogenic Tocilizumab 8% [-6-21%] 47 $2,000 21K Aspirin 8% [2-13%] 79 $1 180K Peg.. Lambda 7% [-138-63%] 4 $500 2K subcutaneous Empagliflozin 4% [-13-18%] 1 $300 4K very limited data PPE 2% [-25-24%] 4 $5 350K Ibuprofen 0% [-9-9%] 13 $1 50K Acebilustat 0% [-1462-94%] 1 $2,000 120 very limited data Levilimab 0% [-289-74%] 1 $2,000 206 subcutaneous Vidofludimus 0% [-597-86%] 1 $2,000 220 very limited data Verapamil 0% [-379-79%] 1 $5 144 very limited data iC1e/K 0% [-1287-93%] 1 $10,000 20 intravenous Adalimumab 0% [-268-73%] 1 $1,000 68 very limited data Zunsemetinib 0% [-1287-93%] 1 $1,000 20 very limited data Sarilumab -0% [-21-17%] 11 $2,000 2K intravenous/subcutaneous Pomotrelvir -1% [-104-50%] 1 $1,390 230 very limited data Remdesivir -2% [-11-6%] 81 $3,120 200K worse w/longer followup Conv. Plasma -2% [-6-2%] 57 $5,000 30K intravenous Vadadustat -3% [-89-44%] 1 $596 448 very limited data Apremilast -3% [-42-25%] 2 $2,000 594 limited data DFV890 -3% [-159-59%] 1 $2,000 142 very limited data rhu-pGSN -3% [-587-84%] 1 $5,000 61 intravenous Aviptadil -5% [-74-37%] 3 $1,000 775 limited data Interleukin-2 -5% [-36-19%] 2 $2,100 94 intravenous Nicotine -5% [-50-26%] 1 $20 213 very limited data Ravulizumab -5% [-45-24%] 2 $2,000 481 intravenous HuMax-IL8 -6% [-147-54%] 1 $10,000 43 intravenous Lanadelumab -7% [-135-52%] 1 $10,000 55 very limited data Vitamin B9 -8% [-41-18%] 12 $1 50K CK0802 -8% [-257-67%] 1 $5,000 30 intravenous Plasma-activ.. -9% [-234-64%] 1 $100 23 very limited data Ibrutinib -9% [-1541-93%] 1 $9,000 46 very limited data FX06 -10% [-156-53%] 1 $10,000 49 intravenous Razuprotafib -10% [-116-44%] 2 $2,000 134 subcutaneous Gimsilumab -10% [-80-30%] 1 $2,000 225 intravenous Lopinavir/r.. -10% [-28-5%] 17 $50 15K Dexamethas.. -11% [-32-7%] 12 $1 11K Gabapentin -11% [-32-6%] 1 $10 129 very limited data Dornase alfa -12% [-87-34%] 3 $2,000 242 very limited data Cannabidiol -13% [-81-30%] 11 $25 18K Sargramostim -13% [-85-31%] 4 $2,000 870 very limited data Brexanolone -14% [-129-43%] 1 $34,000 28 very limited data Losartan -15% [-127-42%] 5 $5 665 very limited data Pentoxifylline -15% [-363-71%] 3 $50 178 very limited data Dolutegravir -15% [-71-22%] 2 $130 1K intravenous Plitidepsin -16% [-356-71%] 2 $2,000 163 intravenous MAS825 -16% [-83-26%] 1 $5,000 138 intravenous Trimodulin -17% [-116-37%] 1 $2,000 166 intravenous Amantadine -19% [-167-47%] 3 $10 527 very limited data Silymarin -20% [-302-64%] 1 $5 50 very limited data Metronidazole -20% [-677-81%] 1 $5 44 very limited data Lufotrelvir -22% [-198-50%] 1 $2,000 58 intravenous Pacritinib -28% [-210-47%] 1 $2,000 200 very limited data Cenicriviroc -28% [-66-1%] 3 $2,000 1K limited data Acetaminoph.. -28% [-41--17%] 27 $1 540K Crizanlizumab -29% [-103-18%] 2 $2,500 463 intravenous Belnacasan -34% [-129-22%] 1 $1,000 31 very limited data Darunavir -34% [-120-18%] 5 $40 2K very limited data BMS mAbs -36% [-492-69%] 1 $2,100 210 subcutaneous Atovaquone -39% [-526-69%] 1 $50 60 very limited data GB0139 -40% [-449-64%] 1 $2,000 41 very limited data Brensocatib -41% [-88--6%] 1 $2,000 404 very limited data Danicopan -43% [-168-24%] 1 $2,000 201 very limited data XAV-19 -45% [-221-35%] 2 $2,000 667 intravenous PPIs -46% [-67--28%] 40 $5 220K Beta-glucans -49% [-823-76%] 2 $25 64 very limited data Olokizumab -50% [-309-45%] 1 $2,000 248 subcutaneous Ixekizumab -50% [-681-71%] 1 $5,000 32 subcutaneous Edaravone -50% [-699-72%] 1 $5,000 38 intravenous TRV027 -54% [-202-22%] 2 $2,000 318 intravenous Glenzocimab -60% [-236-24%] 1 $2,000 62 intravenous Siltuximab -64% [-252-23%] 1 $2,000 149 intravenous rNAPc2 -65% [-304-32%] 1 $3,000 156 subcutaneous Avdoralimab -68% [-226-13%] 1 $2,000 207 intravenous Cytokine Adsor.. -72% [-545-54%] 2 $5,000 83 very limited data Zafirlukast -100% [-1933-80%] 1 $5 40 very limited data Estetrol -102% [-683-48%] 1 $50 171 very limited data Amiodarone -103% [-680-47%] 1 $10 143 very limited data Varespladib -120% [-4351-89%] 1 $1,000 18 very limited data Posaconazole -131% [-200--78%] 1 $2,000 249 very limited data Emvododstat -132% [-628-26%] 1 $2,000 187 very limited data Goflikicept -135% [-492-7%] 1 $2,000 247 subcutaneous Pemivibart -150% [-6014-90%] 1 $5,775 477 intravenous Donidalorsen -151% [-602-11%] 1 $2,000 103 intravenous/subcutaneous Mefenamic Acid -189% [-6566-87%] 1 $50 36 very limited data Baloxavir -200% [-6491-86%] 1 $200 20 very limited data Zenuzolac -200% [-2732-68%] 1 $500 90 very limited data Ammonium Ch.. -202% [-1506-43%] 1 $10 120 very limited data Astodrimer So.. -205% [-7302-87%] 1 $10 197 very limited data Hesperidin -209% [-2820-67%] 1 $5 211 very limited data LSALT peptide -407% [-10036-75%] 1 $2,000 61 intravenous Clevudine -744% [-14450-51%] 1 $10 61 very limited data All studies (pooled effects, all stages) c19early.org July 2025 Favors treatment Favors control
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2+ Cetylpyridin.. 83% 3 very limited data Studies, Improvement Relative Risk Iota-carragee.. 80% 1 very limited data Proxalutamide 78% 4 limited data Indomethacin 74% 4 limited data Chlorhexidine 71% 5 limited data SA58 67% 3 limited data Sentinox 67% 1 very limited data Mebendazole 62% 3 very limited data Ivermectin 60% 105 Chlorphenira.. 56% 3 very limited data Thermotherapy 56% 4 very limited data Regdanvimab 55% 12 Diet 51% 30 Povidone-Iod.. 49% 22 Alkalinization 49% 14 HH-120 49% 2 very limited data Ensovibep 47% 2 limited data Bamlaniv../e.. 47% 21 variant dependent Quercetin 46% 12 Casirivimab/.. 45% 34 variant dependent Resveratrol 44% 3 limited data Adintrevimab 43% 2 intramuscular Melatonin 43% 19 Bromhexine 43% 7 very limited data Sodium Bicar.. 43% 6 Nigella Sativa 43% 14 Propolis 41% 3 very limited data Curcumin 41% 28 Fluvoxamine 39% 21 Montelukast 39% 9 limited data Exercise 39% 68 Hydrogen Per.. 39% 8 very limited data Vitamin D 38% 126 Phthalocyan.. 38% 4 Xiannuoxin 38% 2 very limited data Sunlight 37% 5 H1RAs 36% 17 Nitazoxanide 35% 14 Selenium 34% 4 Bebtelovimab 34% 6 intravenous Tixagev../c.. 34% 19 variant dependent Artemisinin 34% 3 very limited data Bemnifosbuvir 32% 4 very limited data Vitamin A 31% 15 Sleep 31% 16 Metformin 31% 106 Spironolactone 31% 12 Antiandrogens 30% 49 Nafamostat 30% 7 very limited data Vitamin B12 30% 4 Nitric Oxide 30% 13 Hydroxychlor.. 28% 424 Zinc 28% 47 Probiotics 28% 28 Budesonide 28% 15 Colchicine 28% 57 Ibuzatrelvir 27% 1 very limited data Andrograph.. 27% 7 Vilobelimab 26% 1 intravenous Azvudine 25% 37 N-acetylcys.. 25% 24 Amubarv../r.. 25% 4 intravenous Lactoferrin 24% 8 TMPRSS2 inh. 23% 29 Sotrovimab 22% 28 variant dependent Vitamin C 21% 75 Leritrelvir 21% 2 very limited data Azelastine 21% 3 very limited data Niclosamide 20% 6 very limited data UDCA 19% 21 NaCl 18% 8 limited data Camostat 18% 16 SNS812 17% 1 very limited data Famotidine 17% 30 Ensitrelvir 14% 7 very limited data Vitamin K 14% 2 very limited data Paxlovid 13% 82 independent trials refused Atilotrelvir 13% 1 very limited data Deuremidevir 11% 2 very limited data Favipiravir 10% 75 worse w/longer followup Molnupiravir 9% 51 mutagenic/teratogenic Tocilizumab 8% 47 Aspirin 8% 79 Peg.. Lambda 7% 4 subcutaneous Empagliflozin 4% 1 very limited data PPE 2% 4 Ibuprofen 0% 13 Acebilustat 0% 1 very limited data Levilimab 0% 1 subcutaneous Vidofludimus 0% 1 very limited data Verapamil 0% 1 very limited data iC1e/K 0% 1 intravenous Adalimumab 0% 1 very limited data Zunsemetinib 0% 1 very limited data Sarilumab -0% 11 intravenous/subcutaneous Pomotrelvir -1% 1 very limited data Remdesivir -2% 81 worse w/longer followup Conv. Plasma -2% 57 intravenous Vadadustat -3% 1 very limited data Apremilast -3% 2 limited data DFV890 -3% 1 very limited data rhu-pGSN -3% 1 intravenous Aviptadil -5% 3 limited data Interleukin-2 -5% 2 intravenous Nicotine -5% 1 very limited data Ravulizumab -5% 2 intravenous HuMax-IL8 -6% 1 intravenous Lanadelumab -7% 1 very limited data Vitamin B9 -8% 12 CK0802 -8% 1 intravenous Plasma-activ.. -9% 1 very limited data Ibrutinib -9% 1 very limited data FX06 -10% 1 intravenous Razuprotafib -10% 2 subcutaneous Gimsilumab -10% 1 intravenous Lopinavir/r.. -10% 17 Dexamethas.. -11% 12 Gabapentin -11% 1 very limited data Dornase alfa -12% 3 very limited data Cannabidiol -13% 11 Sargramostim -13% 4 very limited data Brexanolone -14% 1 very limited data Losartan -15% 5 very limited data Pentoxifylline -15% 3 very limited data Dolutegravir -15% 2 intravenous Plitidepsin -16% 2 intravenous MAS825 -16% 1 intravenous Trimodulin -17% 1 intravenous Amantadine -19% 3 very limited data Silymarin -20% 1 very limited data Metronidazole -20% 1 very limited data Lufotrelvir -22% 1 intravenous Pacritinib -28% 1 very limited data Cenicriviroc -28% 3 limited data Acetaminoph.. -28% 27 Crizanlizumab -29% 2 intravenous Belnacasan -34% 1 very limited data Darunavir -34% 5 very limited data BMS mAbs -36% 1 subcutaneous Atovaquone -39% 1 very limited data GB0139 -40% 1 very limited data Brensocatib -41% 1 very limited data Danicopan -43% 1 very limited data XAV-19 -45% 2 intravenous PPIs -46% 40 Beta-glucans -49% 2 very limited data Olokizumab -50% 1 subcutaneous Ixekizumab -50% 1 subcutaneous Edaravone -50% 1 intravenous TRV027 -54% 2 intravenous Glenzocimab -60% 1 intravenous Siltuximab -64% 1 intravenous rNAPc2 -65% 1 subcutaneous Avdoralimab -68% 1 intravenous Cytokine Adso.. -72% 2 very limited data Zafirlukast -100% 1 very limited data Estetrol -102% 1 very limited data Amiodarone -103% 1 very limited data Varespladib -120% 1 very limited data Posaconazole -131% 1 very limited data Emvododstat -132% 1 very limited data Goflikicept -135% 1 subcutaneous Pemivibart -150% 1 intravenous Donidalorsen -151% 1 intravenous/subcutaneous Mefenamic Acid -189% 1 very limited data Baloxavir -200% 1 very limited data Zenuzolac -200% 1 very limited data Ammonium C.. -202% 1 very limited data Astodrimer S.. -205% 1 very limited data Hesperidin -209% 1 very limited data LSALT peptide -407% 1 intravenous Clevudine -744% 1 very limited data All studies (pooled effects, all stages) c19early.org July 2025 Rotate device for details Favors treatment Favors control
Random effects meta-analysis of all studies (pooled effects, all stages). Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <50 control events are shown in grey. Pooled results across all stages and outcomes depend on the distribution of stages and outcomes tested - for example late stage treatment may be less effective and if the majority of studies are late stage this may obscure the efficacy of early treatment. Please see the specific stage and outcome analyses. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of early treatment studies (pooled effects). Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <50 control events are shown in grey. Pooled results across all outcomes are affected by the distribution of outcomes tested, please see detail pages for specific outcome analysis. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of all mortality results (all stages). Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <25 control events are shown in grey. Pooled results across all stages depend on the distribution of stages tested - for example late stage treatment may be less effective and if the majority of studies are late stage this may obscure the efficacy of early treatment. Please see the specific stage analyses. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of early treatment mortality results. Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <25 control events are shown in grey. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of prophylaxis studies (pooled effects). Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <50 control events are shown in grey. Pooled results across all outcomes are affected by the distribution of outcomes tested, please see detail pages for specific outcome analysis. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of prophylaxis mortality results. Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <25 control events are shown in grey. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of long covid results. Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <50 control events are shown in grey. Pooled results across all stages and outcomes depend on the distribution of stages and outcomes tested - for example late stage treatment may be less effective and if the majority of studies are late stage this may obscure the efficacy of early treatment. Please see the specific stage and outcome analyses. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
Loading..
Loading..
Random effects meta-analysis of transmission results. Treatments with ≤3 studies with distinct authors or with <50 control events are shown in grey. Pooled results across all stages and outcomes depend on the distribution of stages and outcomes tested - for example late stage treatment may be less effective and if the majority of studies are late stage this may obscure the efficacy of early treatment. Please see the specific stage and outcome analyses. Protocols typically combine multiple treatments which may be complementary and synergistic, and the SOC in studies often includes other treatments. 0.5% of proposed treatments show efficacy in clinical studies.
LATE TREATMENT
Physician / TeamLocationPatients HospitalizationHosp. MortalityDeath
Dr. David Uip (*) Brazil 2,200 38.6% (850) Ref. 2.5% (54) Ref.
EARLY TREATMENT - 40 physicians/teams
Physician / TeamLocationPatients HospitalizationHosp. ImprovementImp. MortalityDeath ImprovementImp.
Dr. Roberto Alfonso Accinelli
0/360 deaths for treatment within 3 days
Peru 1,265 0.6% (7) 77.5%
Dr. Mohammed Tarek Alam
patients up to 84 years old
Bangladesh 100 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Oluwagbenga Alonge Nigeria 310 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Raja Bhattacharya
up to 88yo, 81% comorbidities
India 148 1.4% (2) 44.9%
Dr. Flavio Cadegiani Brazil 3,450 0.1% (4) 99.7% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Alessandro Capucci Italy 350 4.6% (16) 88.2%
Dr. Shankara Chetty South Africa 8,000 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Deborah Chisholm USA 100 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Ryan Cole USA 400 0.0% (0) 100.0% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Marco Cosentino
vs. 3-3.8% mortality during period; earlier treatment better
Italy 392 6.4% (25) 83.5% 0.3% (1) 89.6%
Dr. Jeff Davis USA 6,000 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Dhanajay India 500 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Bryan Tyson & Dr. George Fareed USA 20,000 0.0% (6) 99.9% 0.0% (4) 99.2%
Dr. Raphael Furtado Brazil 170 0.6% (1) 98.5% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Rabbi Yehoshua Gerzi Israel 860 0.1% (1) 99.7% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Heather Gessling USA 1,500 0.1% (1) 97.3%
Dr. Ellen Guimarães Brazil 500 1.6% (8) 95.9% 0.4% (2) 83.7%
Dr. Syed Haider USA 4,000 0.1% (5) 99.7% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Mark Hancock USA 24 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Sabine Hazan USA 1,000 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Mollie James USA 3,500 1.1% (40) 97.0% 0.0% (1) 98.8%
Dr. Roberta Lacerda Brazil 550 1.5% (8) 96.2% 0.4% (2) 85.2%
Dr. Katarina Lindley USA 100 5.0% (5) 87.1% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Ben Marble USA 150,000 0.0% (4) 99.9%
Dr. Edimilson Migowski Brazil 2,000 0.3% (7) 99.1% 0.1% (2) 95.9%
Dr. Abdulrahman Mohana Saudi Arabia 2,733 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Carlos Nigro Brazil 5,000 0.9% (45) 97.7% 0.5% (23) 81.3%
Dr. Benoit Ochs Luxembourg 800 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Ortore Italy 240 1.2% (3) 96.8% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Valerio Pascua
one death for a patient presenting on the 5th day in need of supplemental oxygen
Honduras 415 6.3% (26) 83.8% 0.2% (1) 90.2%
Dr. Sebastian Pop Romania 300 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Brian Proctor USA 869 2.3% (20) 94.0% 0.2% (2) 90.6%
Dr. Anastacio Queiroz Brazil 700 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Didier Raoult France 8,315 2.6% (214) 93.3% 0.1% (5) 97.6%
Dr. Karin Ried
up to 99yo, 73% comorbidities, av. age 63
Turkey 237 0.4% (1) 82.8%
Dr. Roman Rozencwaig
patients up to 86 years old
Canada 80 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Vipul Shah India 8,000 0.1% (5) 97.5%
Dr. Silvestre Sobrinho Brazil 116 8.6% (10) 77.7% 0.0% (0) 100.0%
Dr. Unknown Brazil 957 1.7% (16) 95.7% 0.2% (2) 91.5%
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko USA 2,200 0.5% (12) 98.6% 0.1% (2) 96.3%
Mean improvement with early treatment protocols 238,381 HospitalizationHosp. 94.4% MortalityDeath 94.9%
Physician results with early treatment protocols compared to no early treatment. These results are subject to selection and ascertainment bias and more accurate analysis requires details of the patient populations and followup, however results are consistently better across many teams, and consistent with the extensive controlled trial evidence that shows a significant reduction in risk with many early treatments, and improved results with the use of multiple treatments in combination. (*) Dr. Uip reportedly prescribed early treatment for himself, but not for patients.
Hobbs
PRINCIPLE RCT 413 outpatients patients showing significantly faster recovery with HCQ. Publication was delayed over 5 years. Treatment was very late..
Wimalawansa
Review of food, drug, and nutraceutical regulations and their impact on public health and healthcare costs. Author argues that the current..
Recent studies (see the individual treatment pages for all studies):

Jul 26
Lin et al. The Association Between Metformin Use and Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
33% lower mortality (p=0.76) and 45% higher ventilation (p=0.52). Retrospective 285 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Taiwan with 41 treated with metformin, showing no significant difference in mortality with metformin use. Authors note higher ventilation with use ≥17.5 days, however this requires hospi..
Jul 26
Dinda et al., Phytomedicine Plus, doi:10.1016/j.phyplu.2025.100850 Potential of diterpenoid andrographolide in COVID-19 therapy: an insight on its antiviral-, immunomodulatory-, anti-inflammatory-, antioxidant- and antithrombotic- properties
Review of andrographolide's potential for COVID-19, examining its antiviral, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antithrombotic properties. Authors describe how andrographolide, a diterpenoid from Andrographis paniculata..
Jul 25
McNamara et al., NCT04615949 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CardiolRx™ in Patients With COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Disease or Risk Factors A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
80% lower mortality (p=0.49). Early terminated RCT showing lower mortality with cannabidiol treatment, without statistical significance.
Jul 23
Chen et al., Research Square, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7146347/v1 Vitamin D blood levels and vitamin D receptor polymorphisms contribute to post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 severity in the pediatric patients
Analysis of 123 pediatric patients with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) showing that both low vitamin D levels and VDR genetic variants contribute to increased symptom severity.
Jul 22
Huntsman et al., Toxicological Sciences, doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfaf093 Detection of developmental toxicity of the anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir using gastruloid-based in vitro assays
In Vitro study showing developmental toxicity with N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC), the active metabolite of molnupiravir, in mouse and human gastruloid models. Authors exposed P19C5 mouse embryonic-stem-cell gastruloids to 20 µM NHC, which seve..
Jul 22
Gong et al., BMC Pulmonary Medicine, doi:10.1186/s12890-025-03824-5 Efficacy and safety of combined nebulization of unfractionated heparin, acetylcysteine, budesonide and ipratropium bromide in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized controlled clinical trial
RCT 74 hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients showing improved lung lesion absorption and oxygenation with combined nebulization of unfractionated heparin, acetylcysteine, budesonide, and ipratropium bromide. The treatment group demonst..
Jul 22
Iftime et al., ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, doi:10.3390/ijgi14080283 Spatial and Temporal Correlations of COVID-19 Mortality in Europe with Atmospheric Cloudiness and Solar Radiation
Analysis of 37 European countries showing that COVID-19 mortality was significantly negatively correlated with solar radiation in the previous month and positively correlated with cloudiness in both the current month and previous month, a..
Jul 22
Paul Jackson, C., Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.16325841 Micronutrientes esenciales en la evolución clínica del SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes hospitalizados
Observational study of 15 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Peru showing significant inverse correlations between the intake of zinc, selenium, and vitamin C with both lung damage and oxygen requirements.
Jul 21
Mabrouk et al., International Journal of Molecular Sciences, doi:10.3390/ijms26147002 Afucosylated IgG Promote Thrombosis in Mouse Injected with SARS-CoV-2 Spike Expressing Megakaryocytes
Mouse study showing that SARS-CoV-2 spike-expressing megakaryocytes induce afucosylated IgG antibodies leading to thrombosis, and identifying potential therapeutic targets. Inhibitors targeting FcγRIIa receptor, serotonin transporter..
Jul 18
Monroy-Iglesias et al., PLoS One, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0328232 Effects of vitamin D on COVID-19 risk and hospitalisation in the UK biobank
26% lower hospitalization (p<0.0001) and 5% more cases (p=0.03). Case-control analysis of 151,543 UK Biobank participants showing higher odds of COVID-19 hospitalisation for those with low baseline serum vitamin D, and slightly lower risk of cases. Vitamin D measurements were taken a decade before the ..
Jul 17
Chen et al., Redox Biology, doi:10.1016/j.redox.2025.103766 Viral mitochondriopathy in COVID-19
Discussion of the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Authors describe how SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins disrupt mitochondrial function through multiple mechanisms, including impairing bioenergetics, altering calcium h..
Jul 16
Aktay et al., Phytotherapy Research, doi:10.1002/ptr.70046 Oral Administration of Water-Soluble Curcumin Complex Prevents ARDS With the Potential for COVID-19 Treatment
Mouse and In Vitro study showing that orally administered water-soluble cyclodextrin-curcumin complex (CDC) protected C57BL/6 mice from Klebsiella or LPS-induced acute lung injury and down-regulated COVID-19 relevant pathways: treated ani..
Jul 16
Tamanna et al., Scientific Reports, doi:10.1038/s41598-025-07170-8 Serum melatonin as a potential biomarker for COVID-19 severity
Retrospective 145 COVID-19 patients in South Korea showing significantly lower serum melatonin levels in patients with severe disease and in non-survivors compared to survivors.
Jul 15
Al-Khrasani et al., Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118346 Do vitamins halt the COVID-19-evoked pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the development of neuropathic pain?
Review of vitamin supplementation for COVID-19-evoked pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in neuropathic pain development. Authors examine how certain vitamins may help prevent post-COVID neuropathic pain by modulating pro-inflammatory cy..
Jul 11
Pasquier, D., Nature Communications, doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60478-x On meta-analytic models and the effect of hydroxychloroquine use in COVID-19
Meta-analytic re-analysis of randomized COVID-19 trials (mortality in inpatients; hospitalization in outpatients) showing that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) does not significantly increase inpatient mortality once Hartung-Knapp scale factors a..
Jul 8
Sjögren et al., bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/2025.07.07.663218 Shedding of mitochondrial Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel-1 (VDAC1) Reflects COVID-19 Severity and Reveals Macrophage Dysfunction
In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and retrospective observational study showing that VDAC1 (Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel-1) levels reflect COVID-19 severity and that VDAC1 inhibitors (VBIT-4, metformin, and VDAC1-specific antibody) restore macrophage..
Jul 6
Hoffmann et al., Biomacromolecules, doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5c00576 Controlling the Sulfation Density of Glycosaminoglycan Glycopolymer Mimetics Enables High Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2 and Reduces Anticoagulant Activity
In Vitro study showing the efficacy of carrageenan (used as a positive control) in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Authors preincubated SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus (PsV) with carrageenan before infecting Vero cells. Carrageenan reduced viral ..
Jul 6
Al Mutair et al., Scientific Reports, doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08638-3 Tocilizumab as a targeted immunomodulatory therapy in the management of severe respiratory illnesses: a multicenter cohort study of COVID-19 patients
16% lower mortality (p=0.002). Retrospective 1,470 critically ill COVID-19 patients in Saudi Arabia showing significantly lower mortality with tocilizumab treatment.
Jul 6
Kow et al., Nutrition in Clinical Practice, doi:10.1002/ncp.11349 Vitamin D and COVID‐19: How much more evidence do we need?
Discussion of clinical evidence supporting vitamin D treatment for COVID-19. Authors highlight [Vasconcelos] showing reduced all-cause mortality, and cite their own systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 RCTs that found a significant ..
Jul 4
Hobbs et al., Scientific Reports, doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09275-6 The PRINCIPLE randomised controlled open label platform trial of hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID19 in community based patients at high risk
PRINCIPLE RCT 413 outpatients patients showing significantly faster recovery with HCQ. Publication was delayed over 5 years. Treatment was very late, with 25% of patients ≥10 days from onset. There was no significant difference for hospit..
Jul 1
Wang et al., Scientific Reports, doi:10.1038/s41598-025-05381-7 Impact of early and delayed azvudine administration on COVID-19 mortality: a retrospective study
45% lower mortality (p=0.05). PSM retrospective 604 COVID-19 patients (302 receiving azvudine, 302 controls) showing reduced mortality with azvudine treatment when administered within 8 days of symptom onset.
Jul 1
Ferreira et al., Scientific Reports, doi:10.1038/s41598-025-05683-w Antiviral and anti-inflammatory efficacy of nanoencapsulated brazilian green propolis against SARS-CoV-2
In Vitro and Ex Vivo study showing that microencapsulated Brazilian green propolis (ME-GP) inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection and reduces inflammatory responses. Authors created a microemulsion containing 11% Brazilian green propolis extract w..
Jul 1
Li et al., BMC Infectious Diseases, doi:10.1186/s12879-025-11195-9 Real-world effectiveness of simnotrelvir-ritonavir versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the omicron wave in China: a retrospective cohort study
Retrospective 585 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China showing that xiannuoxin provided better clinical improvement than paxlovid. There were no significant differences for progression, mortality, or respiratory support.
Jun 30
Mylonas et al., International Journal of Molecular Sciences, doi:10.3390/ijms26136332 A Mathematical Model of Metformin Action on COVID-19 Risk Infection in Cardiovascular Diabetic Patients Studied by FTIR Spectroscopy
Ex vivo Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of coronary-artery tissue and fractional-calculus risk modelling showing that metformin use is associated with lower predicted COVID-19 infection and mortality than insulin or thiazol..
We aim to cover the most promising early treatments for COVID-19. We use pre-specified effect extraction criteria that prioritizes more serious outcomes, for details see methods. For specific outcomes and different treatment stages see the individual pages. Not all treatments are covered here, effectiveness has been reported for many other treatments in studies. Of the 6,020 studies, 2,850 present results comparing with a control group, 2,627 are treatment studies, and 223 analyze outcomes based on serum levels. There are 117 animal studies, 223 in silico studies, 424 in vitro studies, 473 reviews, and 248 meta analyses.
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 200,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. IMA and WCH provide treatment protocols.
  or use drag and drop   
Thanks for your feedback! Please search before submitting papers and note that studies are listed under the date they were first available, which may be the date of an earlier preprint.
Submit